I've never really written anything outside of this house. I wrote a very thick Ph.D. thesis for Allahabad University, but I couldn't have actually written it there. I would collect everything and come back home to write. Suppose I have a story to write and I've gone out of town for a couple of days: not a line of it gets written. Someone said that when you go out somewhere you gain experiences and ideas, but if I lived outside Lucknow I wouldn't be able to write anything at all. Or, I wouldn't be able to write like this. There's a phrase that's used, ghar ghunsna [stay-at-home], as in “this is a really stay-at-home kind of man,” meaning someone who never wants to go out, but just wants to be stuck at home all the time. That applies to me. If I go somewhere for a couple of days, I start missing home.
Naiyer Masud, from an interview with Sagaree Sengupta in the Annual of Urdu Studies
A Literary City
Shortly before I left the world of scholarly pursuits, I paid a work-related visit to Lucknow. I was at that time employed in an administrative post at a major research university, and I was visiting Lucknow to look in on an Urdu program there. Since I knew I might not be coming back any time soon, I had it in my mind to do something memorable, something aside from my administrative tasks. I put it to the 'in-charge' of the program, Aftab Ahmad, himself a scholar of Urdu satire, that I would like to buy some Urdu books while in Lucknow. But not just any books. I specifically wanted to buy an Urdu collection of short stories by the Lakhnavi author Naiyer Masud, whose work I had actually come to know via an excellent volume of English translations of his stories, The Essence of Camphor.
For me, Lucknow is an essentially literary city. I realize to many people, it is just another sprawling, dirty, exhaust-filled north Indian town, crime-ridden and filled with corruption. But Lucknow is the city of Umrao Jaan, of Pakeezah; it is the home of the Hindi author Yashpal and the hometown of Urdu scholar CM Naim (well properly Naim Sahib is from Barabanki, as Sepoy points out, but it's close). The busy intersection of Hazrat Ganj is where one goes to visit Ram Advani's bookshop to chat with the worldly and infinitely helpful proprietor, who has provided a haven for book-lovers, scholars and students for so many years. When I step out into the busy traffic after having tea with Ram Advani and nearly get wiped out by the endless swirl of vehicles, I think nostalgically of a character in a story by the Hindi author Ashk, who gets a terrible head cold after riding around Hazrat Ganj on Basant on his scooter wearing a dashing brightly colored turban instead of a woolen hat. On the train down to Lucknow from Delhi, I always half hope that if I get drowsy and nod off, some mysterious stranger will come and leave a scented note written in flowery Urdu between my toes. This, despite all indications to the contrary in the distinctly unpoetic chair car of the Shatabdi Express, with its blue vinyl seats and smudged, tinted windows.
Aftab was enthusiastic about my request and we set off to the neighborhood of Aminabad after classes ended. My romantic notion of a day spent shuffling through richly stocked Urdu bookshops came to an abrupt halt within an hour. Aftab took me to the famous Danish Mahal bookstore, which a number of readers have sent photographs of. Pictured below, a shot by Aligarian. The shop is smallish, with books covering three walls, very high up to the ceiling. The fourth side is open to the street. We were waited upon by a very, very old man. He seemed hazy about whether or not he might have any books by Naiyer Masud, a troubling sign, and feebly scanned the shelves without really moving much. Aftab was having a hard time getting him to commit to whether or not he might have any such books. Finally, he said he thought probably not. We asked where else we might try. He hemmed and hawed a bit and finally said he thought we could get books by Naiyer Masud at the home of Naiyer Masud himself. Both of us were surprised. I asked where it was. He gave hazy directions. Finally, Aftab got him to write the address down. He found a very old piece of paper and wrote down something that vaguely indicated the location of the house.
After this, we made a brief and fruitless try at the Khursheed Book Depot, one of those bright shiny places that stocks textbooks and stationary. The place was teeming with students and staffed by two busy people. Aftab managed to get in the question and they politely responded that they did not carry anything of that kind. We were now left with a quandary. Did we really have the chutzpah to go to the home of an eminent author and demand to buy his books? We decided we would do it. Later, as we analyzed the day, we realized that I had agreed on the basis of my assumption that this course of action had been suggested because that's how things were done in Lucknow. Aftab, on the other hand, had agreed based on his assumption that this was the sort of thing that Americans did-- brashly beating down the doors of literary luminaries to ferret out the merchandise we wanted.
Recently I asked Aftab if he remembered any particular details from that part of the day that he wanted to remind me of. His answer came, Rashoman-like, and in its intricate observation of social details worthy of any 500-page novel, something which I desperately hope he will write someday:
I don't know if you remember that we met two girls in Aminabad. When we were heading toward Danish Mahal, one of the girls came to me and said salaam to us. I introduced her to you, saying this is my cousin. She then addressed me as "uncle." Why must everyone address one another as uncle? I was feeling a little embarrassed because I had introduced her to you as my cousin. You know the complex relationships in India. I later realized that I had reflexively introduced her as my cousin (although she was not even my distant relative) because we lived in the same building and her older sister called me 'brother' (I called her 'bhabhi') and her brother- in -law I called 'brother.' So this girl was obviously a sister to me. But she called me 'uncle' (I had never noticed this before that) because she was a friend of our landlady's daughters. My landlady's daughters called me uncle because I called her bhabhi, defining her husband as my brother. I don't know if you noticed the discrepancy then or not.
I now realize, when leafing through the English collection The Essence of Camphor, that we had pulled up to the back door of the house. In the introduction to the collection, there is a photograph of Masud's home, which his father dubbed “Adabistan,” or 'domain of literature.' The photograph shows a magnificent wedding-cake of a haveli, all ornate details, balconies and archways, surrounded by beautiful trees. Our car pulled up in an alley way, and in the style of antique Subcontinental neighborhoods, it was difficult to tell where any number of houses began or ended.
As indicated in the quote that begins this post, Naiyer Masud has spent his whole life in Adabistan. From an earlier part of the same interview:
Sengupta: You've never gone outside of Lucknow?
Masud: True, or practically speaking, never. I went to Allahabad to do my Ph.D. in Urdu, for three or four years. I used to come back to Lucknow every month. My sister lived in Allahabad, and I stayed with her. So that didn't really amount to living “outside Lucknow.” Other than that, I once went to Iran for sixteen or seventeen days. I've been to other cities, but not for more than four or five days. My whole life has passed in Lucknow, in this same house.
In the annals of authenticity, a debate that I dismissed as a red herring last week, Naiyer Masud would be the quintessentially authentic author. If anyone were looking for an Indian writer that was indisputably authentic, who better than someone who has never written a word outside the house in which he was born? Despite the fact that this is a fascinating idea, and worthy of its own fictional treatment, I'm sure that Masud himself would laugh at the absurdity of the notion that always living in the same house confers a greater degree of Indianness to his writing.
Essences of Masud
In fact, in the introduction to The Essence of Camphor collection, Muhammad Umar Memon, who selected and edited the volume, argues for a reading of Masud's work as not quintessentially like anything but itself. Memon's introduction, which is the kind of masterful close textual reading that is not currently in vogue in literary critical circles, offers a very rich background and basis for interpretation of Masud in only eight pages. As Memon observes:
Entirely un-derivative and unlike anything that preceded them in the history of Urdu fiction, these stories stand in a class by themselves. They are different from the work of the early Urdu Romantics and Didactics on the one hand, and the Social Realists such as Munshi Premchand (1880-1936) and the Progressive writers such as Sajjad Zaheer (d. 1973), Krishan Chandar (d. 1977) and Ismat Chughtai (d. 1991) on the other. Strangely, they also do not approximate to anything of the modernist abstraction and symbolism that had swept over the Urdu fictional landscape in the 1960s and onwards with such relentless force.
Memon goes on to describe how the Urdu in Masud's stories is also unlike any other author's style:
The shimmering but elusive quality of the stories may derive from a number of factors. Not the least of which is the terse and highly clipped prose of the writer, one that shuns even the slightest trace of hollow rhetoric, so stark in its suppression of qualifiers that it unsettles the mind. Few idioms or none, no verbal pyrotechnics of any kind. It is Urdu all right, but it does not read like ordinary Urdu.....The economy, the avoidance of even an occasional exaggeration or embellishment, lend his prose an element of unfamiliarity, if not unreality.
The stories in the collection were translated by Memon himself, as well as Shantanu Phukan, Aditya Behl, Moazzam Sheikh, Elizabeth Bell and Sagaree Sengupta. That the style of the translations is uniform and quite smooth may be attributed to the fact that Masud himself worked with each translator on their individual stories, during which process, Memon suggests, Masud was quite demanding, with Memon finding that his “better judgment and patience were taxed to their limits.”
The stories are elusive and difficult to grasp, being, as they are, unlike anything else, but also because they lack almost any reference to specific places, times, dates, politics or history. Descriptions can be elaborate, but they leave the reader with no bearings in terms of specific locations or historical eras. Take, for example, this passage from the title story, “The Essence of Camphor.” The narrator is describing the camphor essence that he himself makes:
In my extract, however, one does not smell camphor or any other fragrance. It is a colourless solution inside a white, square-bottomed china jar. No fragrance of any kind wafts through the jar's narrow opening when the round lid is removed. Attempting to smell it one feels a vacant forlornness and the next time round, breathing it in more deeply, one detects something in this forlornness. At least, that's what I feel. I cannot say what others feel since no one has ever smelled the extract in its purest form, apart from me. It is true that when I prepare an essence with this foundation those who inhale it think there is something else underneath the expected fragrance. Obviously, they cannot recognize it for there is no fragrance at all in my extract of camphor.
Here is an intricate description of something which, it becomes clear by the end of the paragraph, is indescribable. It is a camphor essence that does not smell of camphor or anything else. It has no color; it sits in plain white jar. It does not emit fumes, and its effect is to fill one with a 'vacant forlornness.' Moreover, no one has ever smelled it but the narrator. One is pulled into an intimate, intricately described world that simultaneously bears no known or knowable markers, and that is as ineffable as the vaporless vapor it describes.
This ineffable, detailed world makes Masud's work simultaneously extremely difficult to understand and highly translatable across languages. With barely any specific references to cultural objects, specific customs or even family relationships (the narrator's female relations are referred to in the same story as his 'women relatives'). Contrast this to Aftab's reminiscence about the Aminabad Market. A brief encounter with two women is parsed in terms of highly elaborate habits of defining social and familial relationships. In a social environment in which Aftab's reconstruction of that moment captures the norm of every day life, referring to characters in a story as 'women relatives' is bizarre and disorienting. But in terms of translation, it works exceptionally well. Nothing is more aggravating to the translator than trying to convey such things as kinship in terms that are not aggressively distracting to the reader. In Masud's work, such challenges appear to be wholly absent.
It never crossed our minds, when we set out to Naiyer Masud's house on the patently ridiculous instructions of the bookseller at Danish Mahal, that we would actually encounter the author himself. Despite the fact that Aftab and I were approaching the adventure from two utterly different perspectives, I believe that our one shared assumption was that an eminent writer of such mysterious works would surely have a system of gate keepers and 'female relations' who would protect us from appearing foolish in our errand when we arrived at the house.
Such was not the case. Our driver pulled up at a door in a wall. We walked through the door into a small courtyard, and there was Naiyer Masud, lying in the sun, arranged upon a bench, chatting with a man I later learned was an Urdu professor at Lucknow University.
I was suddenly seized with anxiety. My Urdu was not good enough for this. I would not be able to think of refined Urdu words for literary things. I knew that Shuddh Hindi words would pop up in their place. I couldn't even remember the Urdu word for literature at that moment. My thoughts were racing through the linguistic inventory, routing all queries for Urdu through the much more secure Hindi compartment of my brain. I was mortified at the idea that I would have to speak to Naiyer Masud using English nouns strung together with Urdu grammar. The Hindi would only provoke peals of laughter, I knew from experience. But then I felt reassured. I was there with Aftab, the head of the Urdu program. He has a PhD in Urdu literature!
But as I stared expectantly over at Aftab, he was totally silent. Somehow our mission was explained, but Aftab barely said a word. I ended up plunging into the Englished Urdu I had dreaded. Masud was very gracious. He did not tell us that the idea that the only place to find his books was in his house was ridiculous. But, he explained, he himself did not have any spare copies either. He was sanguine about the matter and shrugged it off. There simply weren't very many copies. Perhaps they were available in Pakistan.
Since I had come so far, he said he would give me another book. He was ill, and pulled himself up with difficulty, moving slowly over to the large metal almirah nearby on the porch. He fished about in it for a while, and pulled a slim volume. It was a critical work on Ghalib he had written. He asked me my name and wrote an inscription in it, first crossing out what looked like an inscription to someone else. We talked a little about this and that. Aftab continued stayed silent. Perhaps we had some tea.
Finally, feeling that we had already taken too much of his time, especially considering that he was not feeling well, we said goodbye and drove away. In the car, I asked Aftab why he had been so silent. I might even have expressed a bit of annoyance at being left to fend for myself.
“But I couldn't say anything,” Aftab replied, “because I'm not from Lucknow.”
“What do you mean you're not from Lucknow? You live here.”
“But I'm from a village. I'm too embarrassed to speak Urdu in front of real Lakhnavis like Naiyer Masud. They'll know right away I don't speak real Lakhnavi Urdu.”
Really awesome. And the ending is a nice punch. that interview is just worthy of a whole whole dissection. "But in terms of translation, it works exceptionally well. Nothing is more aggravating to the translator than trying to convey such things as kinship in terms that are not aggressively distracting to the reader. In Masud's work, such challenges appear to be wholly absent." What is funny is that in the authenticity debate it is just such "detail" - full of nouns - that readers are programmed to see and appreciate. Yet here is something that even in translation will not have such detail. On the other hand, something like Simiya is going to be actually incomprehensible even translated w/out a whole lot of contextual knowledge. And I really think Aftab Ahmed needs to write an Introduction to a Lakhnavi Mu'halla for CM.
Wow -- haven't had a chance to read this yet, but did want to say that my mother has been trying to find works by Naiyer Masud for quite a while, and we had no luck in Karachi or Bhopal. Does anyone know if one can get any of these in the US?
Oh no. Not Pakeezah. Worst. Film. Ever.
Tremendously evocative piece, and characteristically generous of you to share with us. I should say that the quest for finding Urdu books is worthy of a tale by Borges -- is there any other language spoken by this many people where one encounters similar problems? The other thing I've found is the endless deferral and displacement: no matter which city one goes to, the bookstore owner points one elsewhere -- to other bookstores, to other cities, even. In Hyderabad it will always be another bookstore (perhaps because Hyderabadis refuse to believe any other city in India might out-Urdu them), in Bhopal it was Delhi, in Aurangabad it was Bombay, and when all else fails, it's "perhaps in Pakistan". Alas, Karachi brought no relief on the Naiyer Masud front, and I suspect the grail might lie in some university library in Texas...
I'm sorry, Qalandar, but this is where you and I must part company. Any movie that features a courtesan dancing on chandelier shards is a movie I can't live without.
It isn't the courtesan, but Raj Kumar droning "aap ke paaon dekhe, bahut haseen hain; inhe zameen par na rakhiye, maile ho jaayenge" that traumatized me, casting a long and dark shadow over my childhood. Kidding aside, the "Muslim" culture-as-precious fetish aspect of the "Muslim social" film genre is one that I have no patience for. Perhaps I should re-visit them as camp/parody, but consumed straight, as they were and perhaps are, I find that they do not engage my sympathy at all. The recent Umraojaan at least tried to put some blood and sweat in the rather airless ambience of the 1981 film, but nothing can rescue that train wreck (although perhaps, where the soundtracks are as in Pakeezah or the 1981 Umraojaan, no other rescue is needed)...as to the rest, they are devoid of either passion or play: such earnestness would be inexcusable from anyone, but especially from the courtesan...
PS -- talking about cheezy movies on this thread also clearly demonstrates that had I been on the verandah with you and Aftab Ahmed, I would have been the least worthy of all to give voice to my tongue. :-)
BTW, is the Sengupta interview up? The link isn't working at my end...
vah! The painting is delightful, so is the tale, and I'm ordering the (English translation of) the book. CM is having an unfortunate effect on my no-book-buying policy this semester. I love the notion of this house named Adabistan (is 'adab' the Urdu word for literature in general? and is the word derived from Ø£Ø¯Ø¨ in the religious sense of decorum/refinement?) Also, what a vivid illustration of the malady that some future DSM might one day term Situational Language Anxiety Disorder. And this point about "trying to convey such things as kinship in terms that are not aggressively distracting to the reader" is well-taken: one must be careful not to slip into the role of the anthropologist (unless one is such a sad creature) in what is meant to be the house of literature. (Sepoy, when you invoke the authenticity debate here, are you talking about IWE, translations, or both?)
Very interesting essay. Needs to be chewed over before any proper response. Meanwhile about NM's books. They have all been beautifully published in Pakistan by Aaj Books, Karachi. Write to the publisher, Ajmal Kamal, at: firstname.lastname@example.org. His City Books is a haven for booklovers in the Medinah City Mall. In India, his books were originally published by him; he and his brother also published their father's books, who preferred to publish his books himself. NM's books do go out of print often because of mall print runs. In India, they could be obtained from Shabkhoon, Allahabad, and Educational Book House at Aligarh.
Naim sahib, you have made my (actually, Ammi's) day.
Qalandar, But perhaps you wouldn't have been so tongue-tied. Also, link fixed. Naim Sahib's remarks suggest that going to NM's house for the books wasn't so crazy an idea after all...
Excellent post. However, being an ex Lucknowite, I am ashamed to admit that I hadn't heard of Naiyer Masud before this post.
This is an exceptional article which I will not denigrate by calling "post". It is one to savor slowly with tea and namkeen on a Saturday morning. Although I didn't grow up in Lucknow, your writing brought back fond memories of my childhood in the gallis of Pathan Mohalla in a small town in Eastern India. The songs on the radio, the exquisite smells from the corner halwai. And aah the smell of camphor! I have to try to find the book since it seems to be out of stock from most vendors.
OH NO YOU DIDN'T. Qalandar, how could you? How could you insult Pakeezah?? How could you insult the film that contains this song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubQ9hrKO6XI . DAMNIT QALANAR!!!! But kidding aside, your points are well taken.
Thats a lovely piece of work on Naiyer Masud, who I personally know be a man of few spoken words, the most unique thing about him is that he is also a good listener and there aren't very many people who feel uncomfortable in talking to him. If there was any uneasiness on your part it was quite definitely due to your own perceived notion of the standard of your urdu conversation. I would like to add to CM Naim's info that NM's son Timsal Masud has recently republished an Urdu collection of his short stories 'Ganjefa' (originally published in Pakistan by Scheherzade). A compilation of 11 original stories, it is a very tastefully printed book. Write to the publisher at : email@example.com
I am lucky to know Sir Masud since long. I always fear to go in front of him though I visit Adabistan (his house) regularly. He has got such great personality that you have to think twice before you speak. I wish his work should reach common men so that everyone should be aware that Lucknow have such a talented writer.
The Tehelka article by Mahmood Farroqui is also quite nice. It led me to his articles in Kafila and Farroqui's work on dastongoi http://dastangoi.blogspot.com/
[...] Chapati Mystery: The Stay-at-Home Man [...]
Though Aftab Ahmed as he himself has confessed, is not a Lakhnavi but his detailed defining social and familial relationship with two women, I believe, is in the best traditions of Lakhnavi conversations. However, if that style is completely absent in NM's stories, it is precisely for the reason that if it would have been so, we wouldn't be discussing him in present form. His “terse and highly clipped prose” and “element of unfamiliarity” is hallmark of his prose. I had the privelege of reading Dhulban (Dustland) in Urdu (courtesy of annual of Urdu Studies) and I can appreciate the “elusive and difficult grasp” style of his stories. Would it be all right to add to your chosen epithet; The Stay-At-Home Man, The Allegorical Genious, as well?
My years-long quest for a Naiyer Masud book has finally borne fruit: my mother in New York now has a copy of Itr-e-Kafur; and, courtesy the extremely gracious Ram Advani (of a Lucknow bookshop of the same name), I have Masud's most recent collection "Ganjefa" as well. I've only read the first story (itself called "Ganjefa") so far (I've never read the English translations), but his writing really is unique: the way his prose renders the everyday strange, almost supernaturally so; the repetition of certain phrases to the level of the formulaic or perhaps talismanic ("Tum ne dekha hi kya hai," the mother rhetorically asks the narrator; "Tum kaam kya karte ho," a question that keeps running through the narrator's head); the way the story ends, not so much abruptly as quietly, as if it were waiting for the reader to do something, perhaps even write a sequel, all contribute to a certain ineffable quality, even as I frankly confess I didn't know what to make of it. Needless to say, I can't wait to read some more...
Re: "The busy intersection of Hazrat Ganj is where one goes to visit Ram Advani's bookshop to chat with the worldly and infinitely helpful proprietor, who has provided a haven for book-lovers, scholars and students for so many years." Didn't remember this from the piece -- never having met him, I can nevertheless completely agree with this; Mr. Advani was so very gracious indeed, and had even mailed me my books before I had ever paid him!