<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hersh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html</link>
	<description>what is the vertiginous chapati saying to me?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlowe</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html/comment-page-1#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/uncategorized/hersh#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Neocons possibly have a Zionist agenda? I&#039;m shocked, shocked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neocons possibly have a Zionist agenda? I&#8217;m shocked, shocked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venturi</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html/comment-page-1#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Venturi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/uncategorized/hersh#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Ian Buruma, a colleague of Mr. Hersh, has an interesting review of Lewis&#039; latest opus, &quot;From Babel to Dragomans&quot; in the newest New Yorker. 

My favorite quote from it: &quot;There is often a chasm, of course, between scholary and political acumen.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Buruma, a colleague of Mr. Hersh, has an interesting review of Lewis&#8217; latest opus, &#8220;From Babel to Dragomans&#8221; in the newest New Yorker. </p>
<p>My favorite quote from it: &#8220;There is often a chasm, of course, between scholary and political acumen.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sepoy</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html/comment-page-1#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Sepoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/uncategorized/hersh#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Ian Buruma&#039;s &quot;review&quot; set my teeth on edge. The article pretends to be critical, sets up all the issues...and then lets Lewis walk off? Why? &#039;Cause he LOVES the Arab World too much!? 
 Lewis needs to be drubbed - Orientalist or no Orientalist and I bet that Rashid Khalidi (quoted in the review) probably said a lot of things about Lewis that did not make it into the review.

the review is here for those interested: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?critics/040614crbo_books&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ian buruma on bernard lewis&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Buruma&#8217;s &#8220;review&#8221; set my teeth on edge. The article pretends to be critical, sets up all the issues&#8230;and then lets Lewis walk off? Why? &#8216;Cause he LOVES the Arab World too much!?<br />
 Lewis needs to be drubbed &#8211; Orientalist or no Orientalist and I bet that Rashid Khalidi (quoted in the review) probably said a lot of things about Lewis that did not make it into the review.</p>
<p>the review is here for those interested: <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?critics/040614crbo_books" rel="nofollow">ian buruma on bernard lewis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html/comment-page-1#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/uncategorized/hersh#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Sepoy

On Iraq - what I find most unfortunate is that the international media sees a &quot;Sunni triangle&quot;, &quot;Kurdish areas&quot; and a Shia Sadr city. These divisions may have existed previously, but now they are made to appear like faultlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sepoy</p>
<p>On Iraq &#8211; what I find most unfortunate is that the international media sees a &#8220;Sunni triangle&#8221;, &#8220;Kurdish areas&#8221; and a Shia Sadr city. These divisions may have existed previously, but now they are made to appear like faultlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sepoy</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/hersh.html/comment-page-1#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>sepoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/uncategorized/hersh#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Nitin: could be self-fulfilling prophecy, sure. but, remember that there was no &quot;iraq&quot; under the Ottomans - rather three vilayats: Baghdad, Mosul, Basra. The British, keen to do nothing more than pump oil, created random lines on the ground to create Iraq. 
Damn the Empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitin: could be self-fulfilling prophecy, sure. but, remember that there was no &#8220;iraq&#8221; under the Ottomans &#8211; rather three vilayats: Baghdad, Mosul, Basra. The British, keen to do nothing more than pump oil, created random lines on the ground to create Iraq.<br />
Damn the Empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

