<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Chosun Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/noted/daily_chosun_link.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/noted/daily_chosun_link.html</link>
	<description>what is the vertiginous chapati saying to me?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frog in a Well - The Korea History Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/noted/daily_chosun_link.html/comment-page-1#comment-5295</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog in a Well - The Korea History Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/uncategorized/daily_chosun_link#comment-5295</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s a lot of presentist fallacies and overdrawn conclusions &#8212; just because a society has a reputation for sexual restraint doesn&#8217;t mean that it is and always was asexual &#8212; in this article [Thanks, sepoy, but I don&#8217;t do personal memes here] about sexual imagery in Korean artifacts and art, but it does have some images and facts which are potentially very interesting. Any suggestions for richer, better substantiated works or websites on Korean art (or sexuality and gender issues) which could put this stuff into proper context? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s a lot of presentist fallacies and overdrawn conclusions &#8212; just because a society has a reputation for sexual restraint doesn&#8217;t mean that it is and always was asexual &#8212; in this article [Thanks, sepoy, but I don&#8217;t do personal memes here] about sexual imagery in Korean artifacts and art, but it does have some images and facts which are potentially very interesting. Any suggestions for richer, better substantiated works or websites on Korean art (or sexuality and gender issues) which could put this stuff into proper context? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
