Comments on: You Mean Mahound? http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html what is the vertiginous chapati saying to me? Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:41:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: NONY http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html/comment-page-1#comment-50019 NONY Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:53:46 +0000 http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html#comment-50019 MOHAMMED PBUH WAS A WARRIOR, HE LED HIS ARMIES AND KILLED MANY AND MOST THAT OPPOSED HIM AND OUR WONDERFUL RELIGION. MOST MUSLIMS ARE SHY OF THIS BUT IT IS TRUE AND WE SHOULD BE PROUD. WHY ELSE SO MANY MUSLIMS GO TO SO MUCH EXTREME AND WE ARE TAUGHT TO BE GOOD MUSLIMS WE MUST BE LIKE MOHAMMED,IS THIS NOT OBVIOUS FROM OUR ACTIONS THE NATURE OF OUR PROPHET. RAPE AND WAR ARE O.K NOT ALWAYS RIGHT BUT SOMETIMES...HEY.... MOHAMMED PBUH WAS A WARRIOR, HE LED HIS ARMIES AND KILLED MANY AND MOST THAT OPPOSED HIM AND OUR WONDERFUL RELIGION. MOST MUSLIMS ARE SHY OF THIS BUT IT IS TRUE AND WE SHOULD BE PROUD. WHY ELSE SO MANY MUSLIMS GO TO SO MUCH EXTREME AND WE ARE TAUGHT TO BE GOOD MUSLIMS WE MUST BE LIKE MOHAMMED,IS THIS NOT OBVIOUS FROM OUR ACTIONS THE NATURE OF OUR PROPHET.

RAPE AND WAR ARE O.K NOT ALWAYS RIGHT BUT SOMETIMES…HEY….

]]> By: sepoy http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html/comment-page-1#comment-20265 sepoy Tue, 22 May 2007 13:38:16 +0000 http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html#comment-20265 Sure Anthony, if you insist. Muhammad was not a general. He did not lead in the battles. There is no support in the literature for his ingenious military mind. He definitely cannot be the FIRST INSURGENT since there was no goverment or State or Occupying Authority or Colonial Presence in Arabia in the 7th century. That covers the sub-title and I have no desire to go further into the text. Sure Anthony, if you insist.

Muhammad was not a general. He did not lead in the battles. There is no support in the literature for his ingenious military mind. He definitely cannot be the FIRST INSURGENT since there was no goverment or State or Occupying Authority or Colonial Presence in Arabia in the 7th century.

That covers the sub-title and I have no desire to go further into the text.

]]> By: Anthony http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html/comment-page-1#comment-20242 Anthony Tue, 22 May 2007 09:42:36 +0000 http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/you_mean_mahound.html#comment-20242 I'm sure this is a terrible book. But it would be nice to give a few examples of factual and logical errors. I’m sure this is a terrible book. But it would be nice to give a few examples of factual and logical errors.

]]>