<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Muslim Like Obama II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/a_muslim_like_obama_ii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/a_muslim_like_obama_ii.html</link>
	<description>what is the vertiginous chapati saying to me?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mohammad ejaz</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/a_muslim_like_obama_ii.html#comment-139454</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohammad ejaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=1595#comment-139454</guid>
		<description>Like muslim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like muslim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samaha</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/a_muslim_like_obama_ii.html#comment-135444</link>
		<dc:creator>Samaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=1595#comment-135444</guid>
		<description>"The rumors (or smears) on Obama were never that he was a terrorist but that he was a Muslim."

Well, sure .. Saying Obama is Muslim has various connotations that allowed it to culminate to the point of terrorist.  Simply being Muslim .. Obama is lying that he is Christian - why? Agenda? The insinuation that even he knows that a Muslim can't get elected. Then of course you have the various he's an apostate theories that think about it really hard and our national security is at stake.

In a way though I think this whole Obama Muslim thing works for him.  Often the Muslim issue gets more play than the issues issue - what a way of having your name out in the public arena - being on constant defense of obvious lies.  Maybe McCain should one up Obama and convert ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The rumors (or smears) on Obama were never that he was a terrorist but that he was a Muslim.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, sure .. Saying Obama is Muslim has various connotations that allowed it to culminate to the point of terrorist.  Simply being Muslim .. Obama is lying that he is Christian - why? Agenda? The insinuation that even he knows that a Muslim can&#8217;t get elected. Then of course you have the various he&#8217;s an apostate theories that think about it really hard and our national security is at stake.</p>
<p>In a way though I think this whole Obama Muslim thing works for him.  Often the Muslim issue gets more play than the issues issue - what a way of having your name out in the public arena - being on constant defense of obvious lies.  Maybe McCain should one up Obama and convert ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morcy</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/a_muslim_like_obama_ii.html#comment-134875</link>
		<dc:creator>Morcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=1595#comment-134875</guid>
		<description>Hmm. That digby link is:

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/muslims-and-militants-by-digby-there-is.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. That digby link is:</p>
<p><a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/muslims-and-militants-by-digby-there-is.html" rel="nofollow">http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/muslims-and-militants-by-digby-there-is.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morcy</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/imperial_watch/a_muslim_like_obama_ii.html#comment-134874</link>
		<dc:creator>Morcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=1595#comment-134874</guid>
		<description>I think Digby veers close to something by showing it not quite so much that "all Muslims are terrorists" but that "Muslim terrorist is the new/the same as a black boogeyman":

&lt;q cite='http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/muslims-and-militants-by-digby-there-is.html'&gt;I've been wondering since 9/11 when the right would get around to conflating the Muslim terrorists with "black Muslims" and I think it may have finally happened in the couple of Barack and Michelle Obama. It would seem odd that the right wingers would smear him as being muslim. He's black, not arab, and it doesn't fit the stereotype. But it does fit the stereotype of the Farrakhan type of militant black muslims and that's what they're getting at with this. The image of the &lt;i&gt;dangerous black radical&lt;/i&gt; is the purpose of the muslim smear, not the terrorist association. It's good old, All American racism.&lt;/q&gt;

So the point is that it's all just in the mess of scary Other, and what the cover does is shows (or tries to) how illegible (and overdetermined?) this scary Other actually is. When Obama was &lt;i&gt;just&lt;/i&gt; a Muslim... but now he's also a scary Black separatist, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Digby veers close to something by showing it not quite so much that &#8220;all Muslims are terrorists&#8221; but that &#8220;Muslim terrorist is the new/the same as a black boogeyman&#8221;:</p>
<p><q cite='http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/muslims-and-militants-by-digby-there-is.html'>I&#8217;ve been wondering since 9/11 when the right would get around to conflating the Muslim terrorists with &#8220;black Muslims&#8221; and I think it may have finally happened in the couple of Barack and Michelle Obama. It would seem odd that the right wingers would smear him as being muslim. He&#8217;s black, not arab, and it doesn&#8217;t fit the stereotype. But it does fit the stereotype of the Farrakhan type of militant black muslims and that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re getting at with this. The image of the <i>dangerous black radical</i> is the purpose of the muslim smear, not the terrorist association. It&#8217;s good old, All American racism.</q></p>
<p>So the point is that it&#8217;s all just in the mess of scary Other, and what the cover does is shows (or tries to) how illegible (and overdetermined?) this scary Other actually is. When Obama was <i>just</i> a Muslim&#8230; but now he&#8217;s also a scary Black separatist, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
