What would be an acclaimed blood line in the US? A source of pride and embellishment? Bushes? Kennedys? Rockafellers? There is, at least in the north-east, an interest in tracing one’s lineage back to, say, the Mayflower. The true blue blood bestows a degree of respectability over the individual. Our President’s clan came on the upper deck of Mayflower, the story goes. The fact that most people on the Mayflower were weavers, fishermen and farmers translates into direct lineage of the Earls and Dukes nowadays. There are other sources of geneological pride. Regional history is often a source.
In the Islamic world, there is one supreme blood line: the blood line of the Prophet’s tribe, the Quraish. The descendants of this tribe affix the honorarium “Sayyid” in front of their names. The designation affords them instant respect and, in olden days, even government stipends. As evident, the “true” descendants have to battle the false claimants by drawing out and keeping handy their complete geneological chart. Pretenders are scorned in private and gossiped about in public.
In Pakistan, the crisis (yes, it is a crisis) of exalting your pedigree started right after the Partition. For a large segment of the population, the migration from India meant a new start in a new world. Old identities, families, occupations and heredities were pushed aside for newer ones. Becoming a Sayyid, a Malik, a Chaudhry, or a Mirza etc. was easily done and it was done.
This “pollution” then had to be combated by the “real” Maliks, Chaudhries who started writing and promoting Histories of … clans in the 60s. The attempt here was three fold:
1. To expose the pretenders. Not by naming them individually, but by explicitly charting out the geographic regions where the clan lived, their occupations etc.
2. To set up members-only organizations that helped with seeking jobs, arranging weddings etc.
3. To establish the true pedigree going back to the Prophet or at least, Arabia (this was consistent with the wave of Arabization that happened in Pakistan in the 60s and 70s)
Allow me to give an example from our own clan. On my father’s side, we belong to the Ara’ain Biradari (Biradari=Community). The Ara’ain community put out a History (Tari’kh-i Ara’ain) in 1963:
Sub casts: Sheikh (arabic word meaning elder), Shah, Mula, Malik, Mahr, Mian, Chaudhri.
Qualities: Ara’ains are hardworking, honest, non-competitive, do not give their daughters to other clans or accept dowry, genial. They never ask for handouts, never participate in fraud or illegal activity [the history lists from Henry Burton's 1854 report Thughee in Punjab to show that Ara'ains are not present]. They are Arabs!
The history goes on to enumerate the great members and families of the clan and their participation in the Independence movement and so on.
Just as same, there are other communities that set out their histories, often in contention with each other. In present day Lahore, neighbors know each others clan affiliations, marriages are settled often times in accordance with, or at the very least the knowledge of, the respective communities. “Oh, he is a Malik” is enough to introduce a thumbnail sketch of a person’s character, likely occupation.
The overwhelming desire for pride and prejudice arising out of one’s community tends to cloud any conversation on this subject among Pakistanis. After all, one of the things that sets the Pakistanis (read Muslims) from the Indians (read Hindus) is that the former do NOT have a caste system. So, while the exultation of one’s blood lineage is good, one does not want appear as if our society is stratified and calcified by birth stations. And the point is largely accurate, there are no strict rules over intermarriages, co-mingling, or co-habitations among the different communities in Pakistan. Just preferences.