<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forgotten Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/homistan/forgotten_afghanistan.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/homistan/forgotten_afghanistan.html</link>
	<description>what is the vertiginous chapati saying to me?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qalandar</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/homistan/forgotten_afghanistan.html/comment-page-1#comment-157954</link>
		<dc:creator>Qalandar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=4332#comment-157954</guid>
		<description>(sorry, comment above refers to the NYT piece).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(sorry, comment above refers to the NYT piece).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qalandar</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/homistan/forgotten_afghanistan.html/comment-page-1#comment-157953</link>
		<dc:creator>Qalandar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=4332#comment-157953</guid>
		<description>An interesting piece, although I remain somewhat reticent about such rhetoric, because it can easily be used to deflect arguments against increased intervention by outside powers -- although the argument never seems to prevent involvement in any but the most humanitarian conflicts (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Balkan-Ghosts-Journey-Through-History/dp/0679749810&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Balkan Ghosts&lt;/a&gt;, anyone?). That is, it&#039;s an argument that might be deployed in Year 8 of a war, not Year 0.

Nevertheless, because it helps disturb the sanguine (and maddeningly superficial) view of Afghanistan as a country that one can &#039;t do anything about, as a land, discussions about which are bookended by phrases like &quot;imperial graveyard&quot; and &quot;fiercely ungovernable&quot;, the piece is welcome.  The evocative photographs don&#039;t hurt either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting piece, although I remain somewhat reticent about such rhetoric, because it can easily be used to deflect arguments against increased intervention by outside powers &#8212; although the argument never seems to prevent involvement in any but the most humanitarian conflicts (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Balkan-Ghosts-Journey-Through-History/dp/0679749810" rel="nofollow">Balkan Ghosts</a>, anyone?). That is, it&#8217;s an argument that might be deployed in Year 8 of a war, not Year 0.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, because it helps disturb the sanguine (and maddeningly superficial) view of Afghanistan as a country that one can &#8216;t do anything about, as a land, discussions about which are bookended by phrases like &#8220;imperial graveyard&#8221; and &#8220;fiercely ungovernable&#8221;, the piece is welcome.  The evocative photographs don&#8217;t hurt either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

