<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We don&#8217;t know what we don&#8217;t know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/holydays/we_dont_know_what_we_dont_know.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/holydays/we_dont_know_what_we_dont_know.html</link>
	<description>what is the vertiginous chapati saying to me?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/holydays/we_dont_know_what_we_dont_know.html#comment-129067</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapatimystery.com/?p=1587#comment-129067</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"We don't know what we don't know. And the object is to cut down on that," said one FBI official who defended the plans.&lt;/i&gt;

What I find fascinating (and disquieting) about this whole thing is the way &lt;i&gt;ignorance&lt;/i&gt; has become the enabling factor, the way "we" can do what would otherwise be illegal precisely &lt;i&gt;because&lt;/i&gt; "we" don't know what the heck is going on. That's the logic for torture too, of course, but extending that logic out from the relatively limited spaces of rendition-land into a wide-spread and openly advertised police tactic takes it to another level, doesn't it? Plus the opening line has a grammatical illogic that betrays the underlying narrative: &lt;i&gt;The Justice Department is considering letting the FBI investigate Americans without any evidence of wrongdoing, relying instead on a terrorist profile that could single out Muslims, Arabs or other racial and ethnic groups.&lt;/i&gt; implying that the distinction between "American" (who have rights) and "Muslim, Arabs, or other racial groups" (who do not) is about to be officially recognized doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;We don&#8217;t know what we don&#8217;t know. And the object is to cut down on that,&#8221; said one FBI official who defended the plans.</i></p>
<p>What I find fascinating (and disquieting) about this whole thing is the way <i>ignorance</i> has become the enabling factor, the way &#8220;we&#8221; can do what would otherwise be illegal precisely <i>because</i> &#8220;we&#8221; don&#8217;t know what the heck is going on. That&#8217;s the logic for torture too, of course, but extending that logic out from the relatively limited spaces of rendition-land into a wide-spread and openly advertised police tactic takes it to another level, doesn&#8217;t it? Plus the opening line has a grammatical illogic that betrays the underlying narrative: <i>The Justice Department is considering letting the FBI investigate Americans without any evidence of wrongdoing, relying instead on a terrorist profile that could single out Muslims, Arabs or other racial and ethnic groups.</i> implying that the distinction between &#8220;American&#8221; (who have rights) and &#8220;Muslim, Arabs, or other racial groups&#8221; (who do not) is about to be officially recognized doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
